<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musing on a Summer Afternoon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.froglogic.com/2008/07/musing-on-a-summer-afternoon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.froglogic.com/2008/07/musing-on-a-summer-afternoon/</link>
	<description>A company weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://blog.froglogic.com/2008/07/musing-on-a-summer-afternoon/#comment-13568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.froglogic.com/?p=95#comment-13568</guid>
		<description>Lovely blog, Harri! Those are real musings. It's nice to have a look in your head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely blog, Harri! Those are real musings. It&#8217;s nice to have a look in your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moltonel</title>
		<link>http://blog.froglogic.com/2008/07/musing-on-a-summer-afternoon/#comment-13567</link>
		<dc:creator>moltonel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.froglogic.com/?p=95#comment-13567</guid>
		<description>I've been following the KJS improvements with interest; thanks a lot for working on it :)

However, since hearing about Squirelfish I wondered if taking the same approach (very shortly, a VM instead of a parse tree. the Safari team has a great blog post explaining it) with KJS wouldn't give a better code_speedup/developer_work ratio.
I understand this would depart greatly from the existing KJS codebase, maybe it's too big a step for the available time ? What are your thoughts about it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the KJS improvements with interest; thanks a lot for working on it <img src='http://blog.froglogic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, since hearing about Squirelfish I wondered if taking the same approach (very shortly, a VM instead of a parse tree. the Safari team has a great blog post explaining it) with KJS wouldn&#8217;t give a better code_speedup/developer_work ratio.<br />
I understand this would depart greatly from the existing KJS codebase, maybe it&#8217;s too big a step for the available time ? What are your thoughts about it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
